|
In 1996 the Georgia Chapter of the Sierra Club and other environmental
organizations took the EPA to court. The suit charged that EPA had failed
to force Georgia to develop and implement the TMDL provisions of the Clean
Water Act. The Sierra Club won. In a series of consent decrees, EPA agreed
to the following:
- To ensure completion of TMDLs in a timely fashion for all impaired
waters in Georgia.
- To take responsibility for developing the TMDLS if the state EPD
does not do so.
- To take ultimate responsibility for ensuring the implementation
of TMDLs.
- To ensure that TMDLs for all impaired waters in Georgia be completed
by specified dates.
The consent decree established a schedule for establishing TMDLs for
impaired waters by river basin:
2000 deadlines: Completion
of TMDLs in Suwannee, Satilla, Ochlochnee, St. Mary's basins by June 30
for EPD, by August 30 for EPA.
2001 deadlines: Completion
of TMDLs in the Oconee, Ocmulgee and Altamaha basins June 30 for EPD,
August 30 for EPA.
2002 deadlines: Completion
of TMDLs in the Chattahoochee and Flint basins by June 30 for EPD or August
30 for EPA.
2003 deadlines: Completion
of TMDLs in the Coosa, Tallapoosa and Tennessee basins by June 30 for
EPD, August 30 for EPA.
Failure to meet the above deadlines could result in the revocation of
Georgia's permitting authority. EPA would then have responsibility for
permitting all water withdrawals, discharges and transfers in the state,
which would prolong the application process for these activities.
Because EPD lacks the resources, the U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency has produced many of the TMDLs to meet the deadlines outlined in
the consent decree.
top | back
|